Exploring the psychological underpinnings of social engineering attacks

In this blog, we discuss the psychology behind social engineering attacks and how tactics like authority, urgency, and social proof are used to manipulate individuals.

Malina Henea, Vulnerability Management Analyst of Cognisys

Malina Henea

22nd August 2024

Social engineering is a sophisticated form of manipulation that tricks individuals into relinquishing confidential information, not through force or digital hacking techniques, but through psychological manipulation. This method relies on fundamental psychological triggers such as authority, urgency, and social proof, deeply ingrained in human behaviour. Understanding these principles can help anticipate and mitigate these types of cyber threats.

The role of authority in social engineering

The principle of authority is a powerful tool in social engineering. It exploits our natural tendency to obey those in positions of power. In a typical scenario, an attacker might impersonate a figure of authority like a company executive or IT personnel. They could request urgent access to sensitive data or systems, banking on the victim’s likelihood to comply due to the perceived power imbalance. Historical studies, such as those by psychologist Stanley Milgram in the 1960s, show that people can go to great lengths in obeying authority figures, even to the detriment of others.

Urgency: a catalyst for hasty decisions

Generating a sense of urgency is a powerful tactic used by social engineers. It pressures the target to act swiftly, leaving little time to assess the request’s legitimacy. Threat actors may send urgent messages, warning of impending consequences such as legal action or account closure if immediate steps are not taken. This urgency can blur judgment, prompting hasty decisions that involve disclosing sensitive information. It triggers the ‘fight or flight’ response, compelling individuals to make rapid choices to mitigate perceived threats.

The influence of social proof

Social proof is a psychological phenomenon where people imitate others’ actions to conform to social norms. Social engineers leverage this by fabricating scenarios where numerous individuals appear to be engaging in specific behaviours, such as complying with requests for information. When it seems that many others have already complied, targets are more inclined to believe that the requested action is appropriate and safe. This exploit is particularly effective because it taps into our innate need to belong and conform to societal expectations.

Worker checking email on a computer, highlighting social engineering attack risks

Common social engineering attacks

CEO fraud 

This involves impersonating a high-ranking official to manipulate employees into unauthorised transactions. Such frauds have led to substantial financial losses, capitalising on the lack of verification when orders appear to come from the top.

Invoice fraud

Scammers pose as vendors or customers issuing fake invoices, redirecting payments to their accounts—a direct exploitation of established trust and routine.

Phishing, smishing, and vishing

These techniques use false urgency and seeming legitimacy to steal personal, financial, or security details. The challenge here is the difficulty in verifying the authenticity of the requester due to the impersonal nature of digital communications.

Website spoofing

Creating fake sites that mirror legitimate businesses to harvest data relies heavily on visual trust cues, making them difficult to distinguish from genuine websites.

Ransomware

Often preceded by social engineering tactics, ransomware involves deceiving someone into opening malicious links or attachments, leading to severe data compromise.

Mitigating the risks of social engineering

The key to countering social engineering lies in a comprehensive approach that includes regular training, stringent verification processes, and the deployment of technological safeguards. Training employees to recognise and respond to social engineering tactics can drastically reduce susceptibility. Furthermore, enforcing verification for unusual financial transactions and data requests can help prevent unauthorised access.

Organisations should also promote a security-minded culture, encouraging employees to take ownership of safeguarding the company’s digital assets. Advanced filtering, intrusion detection systems, and secure web gateways are essential in identifying and mitigating potential threats.

Conclusion

The efficacy of social engineering stems from its exploitation of basic human psychology. By understanding the principles of authority, urgency, and social proof, individuals and organisations can better prepare to detect, question, and resist these deceptive tactics. With the evolution of technology, cyber criminals continuously refine their methods, underscoring the importance of continuous education and adaptive security measures to combat these increasing threats. The objective is to safeguard against current tactics while also anticipating and readying defences against future vulnerabilities

Subscribe to receive the latest cyber insights